Search for: "Rob Hoskin"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2008, 3:51 pm
Update: Rob Hoskins is right in the comments below. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:15 pm
Rob Hoskins over at the always interesting ERISABoard has an interesting story about a Second Circuit decision that essentially says “too bad” to a plan participant’s waiver/estoppel theory seeking benefits. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
Rob Hoskins has launched ERISA Experience, a new website, which we must add to the Benefits Blawg page. [read post]
9 May 2008, 6:57 am
My friend Rob Hoskins, Esq. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
Wow, what a great piece by Rob Hoskins summing up the law throughout the circuits on the Moench presumption, by means of a review of a new decision by the Eastern District of Missouri on the issue. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:04 am
Hoskins goes to Wynne, Takhar to Pupatello. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:40 am
Benjamin Hoskins “Bingo Bruce” Paddock carried a laundry list of fake names and nicknames. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
Thanks, incidentally, is due to Rob Hoskins’ baby, the ERISA Board, for catching this odd little fact pattern, and giving me an excuse to discuss trees, forests, and what they have to do with ERISA. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 7:52 am
The other item I wanted to pass along is ERISA lawyer Rob Hoskins’ post on the ERISA Board the other day on this decision from the Southern District of New York noting that medical reviewers in LTD claims are not to be treated as experts for purposes of the federal rules of evidence and that their reports, on which LTD insurers and administrators rely in deciding LTD claims, are not subject to the Daubert standards that govern expert testimony. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 1:07 pm
Rob Hoskins, on his excellent ERISABoard.com, has a summary of a new decision out of the Southern District of West Virginia that emphasizes this exact point, with the Court finding that the participants did not submit enough evidence to allow the Court to actually find that benefits would not be awarded under any circumstances and that the failure to exhaust administrative remedies could not be excused away by claims of futility. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:00 am
Update: Oslers’ team involves: Corporate: Clay Horner, partner, Toronto; Doug Bryce, partner, New York; Don Gilchrist, partner, Toronto; Rob Hughes, associate, Toronto; Medard Fischer, associate, New York. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:55 am
Peter Hoskins reports for BBC News. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Those initial thoughts were shared in remarks that I made at the Joint Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Business Law Forum, and the Wickwire Legal Ethics Lecture, which for 2019 had as its theme “ The ethical and professional responsibilities of business lawyers: Business, Human Rights, and the Sustainable Development Goals. [read post]
